Finance Matters

Archive for March 7th, 2010

(This post previously occurred at The White House blog)

The last few days have brought even more evidence that the health care status quo is working out great for the insurance companies – at the same time as it continues to fail American families and businesses. No wonder the insurance companies are spending millions and millions of dollars to block reform.

On Wednesday, a leading insurance broker laid out in clear terms what many Americans could already guess: the insurers’ monopoly is so strong that they can continue to jack up rates as much as they like – even if it means losing customers – and their profits will continue to soar under the status quo.

Speaking about the lack of competition – a key target of reform – broker Steve Lewis told investors on a conference call organized by Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs:

“Not only is price competition down from year ago (when we had characterized last year’s price competition as being down from the prior year), but trend or (healthcare) inflation is also up and appears to be rising. The incumbent carriers seem more willing than ever to walk away from existing business resulting in some carrier changes…”

What does it mean when the insurance companies “walk away?” It means more and more American families forced to choose between the mortgage and health care bills. It means being hospital visit away from certain bankruptcy. And for Mr. Lewis’s clients – business owners – it means not being able to do the right thing for their employees.

Asked about the rate increases we’ve all been hearing so much about, Lewis said:

“I’d say we settled in a range, on our book of business, from a 5 percent reduction to a 50 percent increase. But generally speaking, we were in the low- to mid-teens, and this is where the real challenges begin.”

Lewis then went on to answer questions about what reform would mean for the scores of businesses across the country who are being priced out of insurance because of lack of competition among carriers. He found that employers agree with the goals and urgency of health insurance reform:

“I think most people would acknowledge that there’s a need for healthcare reform, employers continue to be very frustrated. So when they look at what the Obama administration and the Democratic Majority state as their goals to increase access and lower cost and rail at what may be termed oligopolistic behavior of carriers in certain markets, I think employers really buy into that message and have much of that frustration and anger at our lack of solutions.”

Lewis’s conference call followed on the heels of another eyebrow-raising analysis from Wall Street (PDF).

You remember Wellpoint, the massive insurance company behind the 39-percent rate increases in California. Well, according to a recent study by Wall Street investment bank Cowen & Co. finds that “Wellpoint would be a primary beneficiary” if reform fails.

The Washington Post explains that Wellpoint’s business model is focused on the individual and small-group market where most of the egregious rate-hikes and abuses take place. So enacting reform – with its protections against unreasonable rate increases and guarantees that more of your money will go toward care, not profits – would mean that Wellpoint and others like it would have to change their ways. Which, of course, is what reform is all about.

It’s time to get this done.

Dan Pfeiffer is White House Communications Director

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• NEWSFLASH: It’s Abortion That’s Going To Kill Healthcare Reform
• Chanos Is Done Shorting Healthcare, After Watching This Administration "Give Up All Its Principles"
• Here’s Something We Can Easily Do That Will Accomplish Way More Than Solving Healthcare

While administration leaders tout the positive effects of the stimulus, the big guy, Paul Volcker is realistic about the economy, and recognizes that it can’t stand on its own two feet.

Bloomberg:

“This is not the time to take aggressive tightening action, either fiscally or monetary-wise,” said Volcker in an interview in Berlin yesterday, pointing to “high” unemployment. “So I think we have to, as best as we can, maintain the expectation that it will be taken care of in a timely way.”

Why was Volcker in Berlin?

Trying to convince his European counterparts to support some kind of global equivalent of the Volcker rule. After all a US law limiting the abilities of US banks will be toothless if internationals aren’t limited by the same regulations.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Here’s Proof That The Stimulus Money Is Getting Exactly Where It Needs To Go
• Goldman: Here’s The One Way We Could Have A Double-Dip Recession
• Good News: Unemployment Holds Steady At 9.7%

The number of people that did not look for a job because they were discouraged over job prospects increased from 1.06 million in January 2010 to 1.20 million in February 2010.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Number of People Unemployed For More Than 26 Weeks: February 2010
• Number of Unemployed People: February 2010
• Monthly Unemployment Rate: February 2010

The average weekly hours of manufacturing production workers decreased from 40.7 hours in January 2010 to 40.3 hours in February 2010.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Average Hourly Earnings: February 2010
• Marginally Attached To Workforce: February 2010
• Monthly Unemployment Rate: February 2010

The number of people on payroll decreased from approximately 129.56 million in January 2010 to 129.52 million in February 2010.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:

• Number of People Unemployed For More Than 26 Weeks: February 2010
• Marginally Attached To Workforce: February 2010
• Monthly Unemployment Rate: February 2010