Archive for September 4th, 2010

Tourism near the Gaza border

At the Zikim Kibbutz, near Ashkelon in southern Israel, tourists come in to see what life is like living just a short distance from the Gaza border.

Want To Make A Lot Of Money As A CEO? Fire People

investmentbankersandchampagne

CEOs who fire people tend to make more money. That’s been the trend recently, according to ‘CEO Pay and The Great Recession’ from the Institute for Policy Studies.

IPS:

The 50 top CEO layoff leaders received $12 million on average in 2009, compared to the S&P 500 average of $8.5 million. Each of the corporations surveyed laid off at least 3,000 workers between November 2008 and April 2010. Seventy-two percent of the firms announced mass layoffs at a time of positive earnings reports.

At a time when we should be pulling together to strengthen our shared economic futures, CEOs should not be rewarded for slashing jobs,” says IPS Senior Scholar Chuck Collins. “Realigning the interests of CEOs with their employees and the rest of our country would be good for the economy and national morale.”

It’s disturbing that down-sizing CEOs have earned more recently, but it would be extremely disturbing if the government could control companies behavior in this regard.

So while far from an optimal situation, we’re not sure what could be done about it for private companies, without massively infringing on the rights of individuals (business owners). For example, some companies owners might want their paid managers (CEOs) to reduce staff. Still, it’s horrible to be on the receiving end for sure. It’s a tricky situation. You can see examples of the highest-paid ‘Layoff Leaders’ here.

Join the conversation about this story »


Cairo literary business booming

Egypt’s literary scene is thriving, with a new generation of writers and poets taking advantage of an increasing number of small publishers and social networking sites to get their work noticed.

This Week’s Awesome Mobile Apps

angry birds

In this week’s rockin’ and rollin’ round up:

Shazam, improved!

Spidey’s webs, slung!

Restaurant waits, crowdsourced!

Space, explored!

iPad music making, jettisoned into the future, and more!

Click here for this week’s awesome mobile apps →

from-gizmodo.jpg

Click here for this week’s awesome mobile apps →

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:


THE ETHICIST: Should We Kill Our Cat?

curious cat

Well, it happened.

After an invigorating summer that recalled much younger days, our 15 year-old cat Tony suddenly stopped eating and started barfing.

The barfing was nothing new, but this time it wasn’t accompanied by the usual hairball.

The barfing stopped after a day or two, but instead of perking up and going back to yowling constantly for a lap to sit on and laptop to obscure, Tony retreated to a chair and lay down, alone. 

She (yes, she–my wife hadn’t quite determined her sex when she named her) didn’t eat much for the next few days. She also didn’t get any perkier.  So, on Friday, we packed her off to the vet to learn that she was wildly dehydrated and, worse, that she had “kidney failure.”

Now, it turns out that, as in humans, kidney failure is not an instant death sentence. They don’t do dialysis with cats, but they do hook them up to IVs and pump them full of “fluids,” and the fluids perform a similar service as dialysis.

To perform cat dialysis, we soon learned, you get one of those big IV bags, hang it on a hook, and put a needle on it. Then you hold the cat on the floor, grab some of the fur on the scruff of the neck, and poke the needle in. Then you keep the cat immobilized for a few minutes until the designated amount of “fluids” have dripped in.

The fluids go in too fast to be immediately absorbed, so they drain to the bottom of the cat. So when we got home from the vet yesterday, Tony had odd-looking globules of unabsorbed fluids floating around on her belly. But, miracle of miracles, she looked fluffier than she had two hours earlier. And two hours later, the globules were gone, and she was purring and stretching again.

There is a chance, the vet tells us, that through daily IV-rehydration, we can shock Tony’s kidneys back to health. So that’s the plan for the next three days: Daily trips to the cat nursing home to get hooked up to the IV. Then they’ll check her blood levels again. And then, most likely, it will be decision time.  And here’s what that decision will boil down to:

We can “prolong her life,” maybe for years, by giving her IV fluids every day.

We can accomplish this by carting her off to the vet every day, where, for a fee, they will perform the procedure described above ($15-$20 a day). Or, we can order those IV bags and needles from a medical supply company and do it ourselves (apparently you don’t need a license to perform internal medical procedures on your cat).

Alternatively, of course, we could order up a crate of tuna-fish, catnip, and milk, throw Tony a Bacchanalian 15th-birthday bash, and then drive her off on one last one-way trip to the vet.

So, the question is… Should we kill our cat?

Or, more accurately, should we:

1) do nothing and let her die,

2) proactively kill her, or

3) “prolong her life” by stabbing her with needles and giving her kitty dialysis every day?

This decision, it seems, is a microcosm of what is going on in our healthcare system at large. It involves questions of money, time, effort, and length of life versus quality of life.  It also involves far more profound philosophical concerns, such as playing God and being and not being.

Where are we on this decision?

Well, we’re not carting the cat off to the vet for dialysis every day.  That would cost $500 a month ($6,000 a year), in addition to 30-40 hours a month.  Call us monsters, but we’re just not signing up for that.

We’re also not eager to have the cat killed or just sit around waiting for her to die.

But home dialysis? A few dollars plus medical equipment plus time every day?

A week ago, my wife and I would have dismissed the idea. This is a 15 year-old cat we’re talking about–an awesome cat, yes, but a 15-year-old cat–and 15 is like 90 in cat years. Everyone dies eventually. Including cats. And the “prolonging life” madness has to stop somewhere.

But now, with the cat’s life in our hands, I’ve got to admit that we’re thinking about it. 

And that’s before we bring the kids into the discussion. 

And I have no doubt what their answer is going to be…

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also: